🔗 Share this article

Loved ones of people laid to rest in graves vulnerable to shoreline retreat state that a lack of decision on how best to address the issue is creating unnecessary distress concerning the eternal homes of their departed family.

An Impending Danger to Ancient Churchyards

Local authorities have singled out three burial grounds in the villages of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being in danger of being engulfed by the sea in the coming decades.

A newly published study on the situation details a series of possible actions, from doing nothing to exhuming remains and relocating them in more secure sites. Authorities maintain it is for local people to determine how to proceed.

“At the moment we’re in a state of uncertainty. It causes me distress. They wanted this to be their final resting place, but it won't be because of the encroaching sea.”

Projections indicate at least part of one churchyard could fall into the waves in the next 80 years, but some residents fear it will happen much sooner. “I think it’s got under 20 years, if you consider what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” one said.

Haunted by the Ghosts of Eccles

One resident remembered a childhood visit to the neighbouring village of Eccles, which has almost entirely vanished into the water, including its place of worship and burial ground.

“You could see human remains,” she said. “Certain people hold this romantic idea that the deceased will just get carried away to sea. They won’t. People will take bones as mementos and go grave robbing looking for treasures. That is completely disrespectful.”

“I fear that the same thing that befell at Eccles will occur here and there’ll be bones on the shore. I’d be disgusted by that.”

A Paratrooper's Resting Place in Jeopardy

Further up the coast lies the burial plot of a ex-soldier killed while working abroad. His parent expressed she lost sleep after discovering her son’s grave might one day be moved.

“It does trouble me to consider this may not remain his permanent resting place,” she said. “To our family it’s an important site to visit.”

In her view, new interments should cease but says it is too soon to disturb current plots. “My preference for now is to take no action and closely monitor, but an early decision must be made when a tipping point has been reached.”

Searching for Solutions and Clarity

An absence of consensus over the timing and method to tackle the problem has left bereaved families feeling frustrated and anxious.

Several families want additional sea defences to slow the unavoidable loss and to permit funerals to proceed for now. Others contend the time for moving graves is approaching.

“The situation is very emotive,” said one relative. “The official study was thorough, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is taken forward. And everybody is avoiding responsibility over who is accountable.”

A coastal manager said the burial sites were owned and managed of the church authorities. “Ultimately it is down to them to choose the path to take. Our role is here to assist them through that process with communities.”

He added there was ample time to consider all the choices. “We are talking decades before it begins getting lost.”

“There is no unified opinion on what should happen yet. It requires good local conversations to discover the right answers for each community.”

The possibility of losing the historic sites was described as one of “immense sadness for the local community,” but faith leaders also referenced a belief in resurrection, offering a spiritual perspective on the temporal loss of hallowed earth.